(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-22 12:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] girlydoll.livejournal.com
I can't listen to it at work, but the name sounds a little offensive.

What is the general jist of it, for or against?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-11-22 01:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com
For, except in a few specific cases. It's for immunization for diseases like rubella and chicken pox, but only if you can achieve optimal immunization rates (50 - 60%) within a relatively short time; if you don't, you'll actually create more disease in adults than you would be preventing with the vaccine, and the disease will be worse. So, in order for these vaccines to be effective, you need a program like Canada's, where every child gets them (in theory) so the immunity threshold is higher than 50%.

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags