velvetpage: (Default)
We, the female gamers of the world, are FUCKING tired of this.

Who in the world thinks this could possibly be anything but a sexist, classist clusterfuck?

No, this is not sexy. No, this is not funny. It is demeaning and rage-inducing. A pregnancy tracking sheet? Really? It's like a bad Youtube satire of playing with girls. "Roll to see if you're menstruating!" Filling in your bust and waist measurements on your character sheet? Really?

We are more than our genitalia. We want to play characters who are more than their genitalia. We want you to respect that we're fully-fledged human beings. Why on earth is that so difficult?

*Disclaimer: the men I play with, to the best of my knowledge, will all see this as just as jaw-droppingly disgusting as I do. That's one reason I continue to play with them.
velvetpage: (Default)
Inanity of bureaucracy, example #56 439: In its infinite wisdom, the government of Ontario set out to put a law in place that would provide students with only healthy food at school, to give them good role models for healthy eating in general.

Sounds okay, right? Here's what's happened:

1) The school and school board aren't allowed to provide any unhealthy foods at in-services for teachers, or staff meetings. On their list of unhealthy foods: anything with caffeine. Someone please explain to me how serving coffee and tea to teachers at an in-service, where the kids aren't present, is setting a bad example for the kids? Because I'm not seeing it.

2) A whole bunch of small pizza places are going to have trouble surviving if they previously relied on the school market. The regulations require them to print every ingredient on the box, and only a couple of chains are big enough to be able to afford to specially-print their boxes with that information. While they're looking for allergens of course, they're focusing more on fat content and empty calories, so regular mozzarella has been replaced with a low-fat version and the crust is now whole wheat, and something was done to the sauce, too. Even if the small places could comply with the ingredients, they can't comply with the labeling so they're out of luck. All this from preventing a slice of pizza with regular mozzarella and white flour from getting into kids' stomachs at school once or twice a month. It seems like overkill to me, too.

3) Parents aren't allowed to bring in snacks for birthday parties anymore, not even if they're labeled, because they break the 80/20 rule of 80% healthy food to 20% treats.

4) Teachers aren't allowed to use candy or other treats as an incentive in class. This is the only one of the whole thing that I can get behind, and even this is taken to an unreasonable extreme: you mean I'm not allowed to hand out freezies to the cross-country team as they finish a race? Really?

5) We get a certain number of "free days" when the rules temporarily disappear, and we have to decide in September which days they will be. There will still be a Halloween party, and a Christmas party, but no, we can't hold anything a day before the rest of the school because it fits our schedule better as a class, because then it wouldn't be on the "free day."

6) Their list of healthy foods is weird. Diet caffeine-free pop seems to be fine. I'm confused; all the research is suggesting diet pop is at least as bad, or worse, than regular pop. (Yes, I drink it anyway.)

I am truly annoyed. I think I'll take a six-pack of Coke Zero (with caffeine!) to the in-service on Tuesday to share with people who don't realize they can't get coffee when they get there.
velvetpage: (Annarisse)
The scene I just posted deals with a major character coming back to the faith of his childhood. (That's the end of the spoilers for this post, I promise.) The religion in question is called S'Allumer. (As the resident consultant for the French language while Ironclaw was in the development stage, I was instrumental in naming it, but the rest of the development of the faith in the Ironclaw world had nothing to do with me.) For those among you who don't speak French, "s'allumer" is a verb meaning, "to light up." The religion venerates light, but in other respects is very Catholic in a medieval sense. Much of the vocabulary and imagery is taken from Catholicism. It's easy to do, because Christianity uses the metaphor of light quite extensively. During our first campaign, while playing Annarisse, I remember taking advantage of a bit of downtime in-game to come up with filks of Christian hymns that I could use in character, changing a few words so they'd fit. I know, heresy. :) But it was fun.

Anyhow.

It occurred to me just now, while answering a comment about the scene I just posted, that I'm fighting a common trope of modern fantasy novels. Pretty much every generic medieval/Renaissance fantasy world has something called the Church. Often there's a suggestion of a Sacrificed God, just to drive home the analogy with the force of a stake through the brain. "Hello! I'm not calling it Catholic, but that's what it is! See, I can prove it! There's a sacrificed God! Mercedes Lackey does this. So do a few of the Dragonlance books, IIRC. Terry Pratchett does it, though admittedly tongue-in-cheek. Even Ursula Vernon's new book does it. And in most of them, the Church of the Sacrificed God is, if not outright evil, then at least a cover for much of the evil that goes on. It seems most of the worshippers and pretty nearly all of the priesthood are insular, domineering, power-hungry, and phobic about some group of "others," and often more than one group of "others."

I can't remember very many instances in any of those books where there were good characters who believed in the faith and got solace, and peace, and joy from it. I remember a couple of spots where the author countered their own "The Church is Teh Evil" with a, "Yanno, they're not ALL bad" plot point, but that's about as good as it tends to get within the sword-and-sorcery genre.

I'm tired of it.

Churches are human institutions. Humans make mistakes. They do stupid, or nasty, or power-grabbing stuff from time to time. Sometimes they do those things pretty consistently. But not everyone within such an institution is doing those things. Some of them are there for good reasons. Some of them are trying to lead pious lives in tune with God. Some of them are trying to help. Some of them are even succeeding in that help. There are people who are unaware of the politics surrounding the institution, who believe it, and experience peace through it, and help others out of allegiance to it.

I have been fighting this particular element of the sword-and-sorcery genre of which Ironclaw is a sub-genre. There are evil priests in the books - it's one of the main plot points in Dream-Carver. But there are also good people striving to do right through their faith and because of it. Redemption comes about in many ways in my writing, and the faith is one of the vessels for redemption.

Arg.

Jan. 29th, 2007 12:10 pm
velvetpage: (exterminate)
Very sleepy today. Something to do with five wake-ups in four hours will do that to a girl.

According to one person in booju, who subsequently pointed it out in [livejournal.com profile] stupid_free, I'm a racist misogynist who is unworthy to teach her kids. The reason? I agreed with the statement that much of the history in North America, at the level taught to elementary school children, was created by white men. I also challenged her assertion that the only reason history books concentrate on white men is that the books are written by white men.

Where do I begin?

Okay, let's start with the pyramid example. Throughout history, it's been the people at the very top of the social pyramid who got the most press, because they had the power to direct events. When teaching elementary school history, I have to focus on that top of the pyramid because keeping it simple is absolutely necessary. Believe me, I've tried to get into the complexities. It generally doesn't work, and I end up giving A's to the kids who get it - which means I didn't expect them to get it, it was just a bonus. As you go further in the study of history, you start to learn about the next levels down - the supporting cast, if you will. These are the inventors, the writers, the philosophers, the rebels, and there are plenty of people of colour amongst them. I teach about these in elementary school, but usually, it's not as part of the grand scheme of history; it's more of an anecdotal story. They get woven into the Big Picture later, in middle school and high school, as kids get better at drawing links between disparate items. The next levels down on the pyramid start to get into people who weren't literate enough to leave us their own voices, or who chose not to, and except for painting a broad picture, their stories are mostly left for college/university studies.

Does it make me a racist to focus on the people who made the laws and ordered the armies to war? No - it makes me a teacher of history. After they have the idea of what happened, then they can go back and fill in the details, and that's where the broader picture will come in. But they need a framework to do that - and the framework, until the last forty or fifty years in North America, was provided mostly (not exclusively, but mostly) by white men.

As for misogyny - I find it rather ironic to accuse a woman who is as much a product of feminism as I am, of misogyny. I want everyone treated fairly, which means that I don't want one group to get ahead at the expense of another, innocent group. School isn't working for boys these days. They drop out more often, don't read as well, don't get as many helping hands, as girls do. Adjusting or adding to my teaching strategies in order to help everyone achieve their best is MY JOB. I'm not going to let the girls suffer for it, but I'm not going to encourage the girls at the expense of the boys, either. It's not fair to anyone to do that.

Okay, that's my rant.

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags