![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Technically, it's illegal for me to bring a movie from my personal collection and show it at school. I have a personal home-use licence on that movie, not a public viewing licence, and a school is considered public viewing even if we're not charging for it.
I think this law is ridiculous and impossible to enforce, but it's on the books. I also think that most schools would agree to pay a small amount more for a copy that was licensed for classroom use - classroom use being a different category from general-public use. I'm sure most schools would be willing to pay, say, $30 for a DVD they could get for $20 without the licence, in order to be on the right side of the law. But that requires an update in copyright legislation, and copyright legislation is not going towards making thing easier for the consumer these days. In fact, there's a law being debated in Canada right now that would make transfering music from my CD to my computer to my MP3 player illegal, even if the original CD was legally purchased.
Any thoughts?
I think this law is ridiculous and impossible to enforce, but it's on the books. I also think that most schools would agree to pay a small amount more for a copy that was licensed for classroom use - classroom use being a different category from general-public use. I'm sure most schools would be willing to pay, say, $30 for a DVD they could get for $20 without the licence, in order to be on the right side of the law. But that requires an update in copyright legislation, and copyright legislation is not going towards making thing easier for the consumer these days. In fact, there's a law being debated in Canada right now that would make transfering music from my CD to my computer to my MP3 player illegal, even if the original CD was legally purchased.
Any thoughts?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-07 06:02 pm (UTC)Even if the law passes, it doesn't look like it's really going to be enforced, though. As it is, the RCMP has declared (http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ledevoir.com%2F2007%2F11%2F08%2F163562.html&langpair=fr%7Cen&hl=en&ie=UTF-8) that they're not going after personal filesharers, because it isn't worth their time. "It is too easy to copy these days and we do not know how to stop it." I can only imagine that this will be doubly so once even more people are considered criminals.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-07 06:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-07 06:38 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-07 07:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-07 07:54 pm (UTC)here's one explanation of it.
http://www.criterionpic.com/cpl/lcl_frequentlyaskedques.html
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-07 08:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-07 08:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-07 09:02 pm (UTC)It's a bad, bad law.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-07 10:11 pm (UTC)ha, I must be a real badass. cuz for DQPA and teaching my kids a halloween dance, I not only brought the CDs from home, but also downloaded some of hte songs it off the web (tsk tsk).
is it illegal to show a movie that you rented? I've seen teachers do that all the time.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-07 10:28 pm (UTC)I pay for the songs I download, mostly. I figure for the amount of music I buy, I can afford a few bucks here and there to support an artist. But when I download it, I expect to be able to use it in whatever format my legally-purchased technology allows for, up to and including playing it for my class.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-12-08 12:40 am (UTC)in my experience teachers never want to pay... f'r instance my sister wanted "The Little Mermaid" - I'd just bought a copy off EBay.
Just as well the beggar was a bootleg for I never saw it again.....