velvetpage: (Default)
[personal profile] velvetpage
I think it covers all the bases, and allowing seven days for the users to clarify their profiles is entirely reasonable.

http://news.livejournal.com/99159.html

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-31 02:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] snobahr.livejournal.com
Reasonableness has no place in this orgiastic flamefest of LJ Drama.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-31 04:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stress-kitten.livejournal.com
If they're going to require that interests be limited to "likes" then they need to provide some sort of key-word process... otherwise how can people looking for things like rape-survivor support find the communities? Currently, people are doing this by using the "interests" section as key-words.

I'm still wary... it smacked too much of meaningless soothing in some respects. Better would have been the immediate reinstatement of all journals, and then following their own terms of service to suspend the ones that deserve suspending.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-31 09:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com
I gather that would have left them liable in those journals that actually were doing illegal stuff. I feel that a quick review/reinstatement process is better.

That said, I agree with you about the interests. No matter what it says in the userinfo suggestions, people don't use the interests as "I like" statements - as you said, they use them as key word searches.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-05-31 11:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] stress-kitten.livejournal.com
Repeated court decisions in the US have found that the provider is NOT liable in such cases. :-)

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags