Seeing red.
Jan. 21st, 2007 03:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
http://www.christianpost.com/article/20070121/25323.htm
Now, my mother was ordained. My MIL was ordained. My great-grandmother was ordained. The pastors at my church, husband and wife, are ordained, and Mrs. Captain preaches more often of the two. And to the best of my knowledge, they all did their jobs well. I fail to see why a single sentence from a misogynist two thousand years ago, taken out of its cultural context, should prevent this woman from doing her job - even if her job were to be a pastor, which it wasn't.
These people are not a credit to my faith.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-21 08:46 pm (UTC)No wonder so many people hate Christians. :(
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-21 09:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-21 09:30 pm (UTC)I'm willing to bet they had a private reason for wanting her out and this was the most convenient way to do it.
It's the loonies that are giving the majority of relatively sane Christians a bad name, and it's really got to stop. I'd like to see the day when the term "devout Christians" brought to mind a caring, open-minded, sane group of people. I suspect Jesus would not be impressed with the followers (and their leaders) that are supposedly acting in His name in the modern day.
*shakes head and goes back to the solitary worship that seems to make so much more sense these days*
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 02:51 pm (UTC)"Dear God, save me from your fan club."
Sad that
so manyall of those who get the press are the rabid, frothing sort of Christian... I actually like most of the Christians I actually know... but then they demonstrate their faith by their life, not through preaching at me.(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 09:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-21 09:31 pm (UTC)Not that it makes it right, but she could seriously make them regret taking this "religious" stance.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-21 10:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-21 10:09 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-21 10:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 01:35 am (UTC)The fact that they could possibly make such an excuse and have any plausibility bugs me as much as the fact that they DID make it.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-21 11:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 01:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 02:47 am (UTC)...or maybe it's not. Selective reading/translation/interpretation of the Bible is at the heart of both matters. I wonder just how many of the Commandments that little trick breaks?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 10:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-22 10:19 pm (UTC)This guy who lived a long time ago gave us this rule, which you have to live by. No, you can't argue with it, it's the rule handed down by God. If you really want to argue it, we can arrange an appointment.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-25 12:52 am (UTC)And Paul? Not Jesus, memory serves he wasn't even one of the original followers. You'd figure that people would be a lot less rabid about it.