![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I can think of a few people on my list who will think this is the best thing to happen to Christianity in a long, long time. There are probably others who will be very disturbed by it.
This link is not particularly work-appropriate, though there isn't much that's actually unsafe about it.
http://www.sexinchrist.com/pornography.html
This link is not particularly work-appropriate, though there isn't much that's actually unsafe about it.
http://www.sexinchrist.com/pornography.html
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 04:04 pm (UTC)*blinkblink*
I must think on this for a bit. I am at once appalled and intrigued. Leaning heavily toward intrigued as I read the qualifications.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 04:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 04:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 11:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 04:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 04:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 04:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 04:56 pm (UTC)I once heard someone say, "If you look for a booger hard enough, you'll find it".
It looks like this is some dude trying to justify sexual things by twisting around the words of the Bible however he can to meet his needs.
Anyways, interesting...
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 04:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 05:56 pm (UTC)CLEARLY Jesus was going to show her how to give a blowjob. o_O
The idea of Christian centered porn is intriguing, as you said. Personally I'm not sure as to go as far as PORN (seems to me that would set one up quite nicely to lust after someone other than a spouse), but as you said, Song of Solomon is essentially erotic poetry. The people/person/whatever who run that website, though, are not the people to do it. Their interpretations of scripture are more than a little questionable, I think.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 06:22 pm (UTC)I *thought* someone told me in the past that it was satire, but I'm not sure.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 06:38 pm (UTC)It has to be satire. I refuse to believe anything else. (If it isn't satire, please don't tell me. I may not be Christian any longer, but I really don't need the few good memories I have of church tainted by the fist of God...)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-03 08:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-03 08:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-03 08:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 11:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-02 11:59 pm (UTC)As with many others, the title of the fisting article made me think satire.
It reminded me of the site I mentioned on 'mama's post, with these two "helpful visuals" that made Ian and I laugh for months:
Right (http://web.archive.org/web/20060426093403/http://www.freewayblogger.com/abstinenceonly/images/right.jpg)
Right (http://web.archive.org/web/20060426093403/http://www.freewayblogger.com/abstinenceonly/images/wrong.jpg)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-03 12:00 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-03 12:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-03 01:01 am (UTC)