Re: My Confession...

Date: 2007-02-02 02:13 am (UTC)
When I was in university, I purposely took a few history courses that were outside of the locations where my experience and background lay - specifically, a history of Islam and a survey history of ancient China up to the Ming dynasty. I was accustomed to getting A's in history because I wrote well and had a lot of background knowledge to bring detail to my essays. It wasn't until I took those two courses (and got B's) that I realized something crucial: I wasn't good at history because I'd studied a lot of history. I was good at history because I'd read a lot of historical fiction, and internalized many of the details. My grade sevens used to draw Quebec City in 1650 with paved roads and cars; I don't think I would ever have done that, because I had read so widely that I knew better long before I would have been taught that in school. But, since a lot less of my reading was set in the Middle East or China, I lacked the background knowledge to get A's in those classes. The A's invariably went to students who were from those backgrounds.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags