I finally clicked on the link.
Dec. 13th, 2006 08:22 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
That article about soy being full of estrogen, and soy formula being responsible for homosexuality - um, wow. That guy is off his rocker. He tipped it so far that it fell over and shattered in a million pieces, at least a few of which are clearly lodged in his ass. Wow.
The first rebuttal that comes to mind: Asian cultures have always used a lot of soy, though it's fairly recent in North America. So why is it that Asian cultures have about the same rate of homosexuality as Western ones?
And I shudder to think what someone with little scientific knowledge and a serious thing for breastfeeding could do with this piece of misinformation. "Formula will make your son gay! On noes!!!111!!!!"
I don't have time for more.
The first rebuttal that comes to mind: Asian cultures have always used a lot of soy, though it's fairly recent in North America. So why is it that Asian cultures have about the same rate of homosexuality as Western ones?
And I shudder to think what someone with little scientific knowledge and a serious thing for breastfeeding could do with this piece of misinformation. "Formula will make your son gay! On noes!!!111!!!!"
I don't have time for more.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-13 01:34 pm (UTC)We actually talked a little bit about this at some of the science programming at 9ICB.
It is true that soy can cause problems, at least for the baby of a pregnant women. I'm not aware of it causing problems for everyone else. Furthermore, it isn't so simple a relationship as the more soy
you have, the worse off you are. Apparently, it's a U relationship.
If you have very little soy, or tons of soy, it could have effects on the child you are bearing, and the child could be born intersexed. The big problem there is that most forms of intersexuality are associated with health problems -- some of them quite severe.
The thing about this that makes me nervous is ... what constitutes a little? A lot? If I were going to be pregnant, I would want to look at how the study defined those numbers, so I could make sure I was
either having NO soy, or in the middle zone.
Anyway, as ridiculous as that article is (and scientifically inaccurate, big surprise there), there is some basis in fact there.
What's that saying? A little knowledge is a dangerous thing.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-13 01:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-13 01:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-12-13 04:49 pm (UTC) - Expand(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-13 01:58 pm (UTC)(Kidding. And as someone who until recently had too much testosterone I assure you I have never set foot in, nor have any desire to go into, a Hooters.)
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-13 02:40 pm (UTC)As for his attitudes about homosexuality... why must some people feel so threatened by things that don't concern them in the slightest? Sad.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
Date: 2006-12-13 04:37 pm (UTC)That was just such as funny and beautifully crafted statement that I had to comment to tell you so!!! ROTFL!!
(no subject)
From:Crazy people everywhere unite to form the Intarwebs!
Date: 2006-12-13 08:15 pm (UTC)Most of the time, the biggest problem with stuff on the internet is that the only way to tell if someone is crazy is to look closely at what they write.
And yes, I've had other LiveJournal users tell me both of the latter examples are absolutely true.
Re: Crazy people everywhere unite to form the Intarwebs!
From: