(no subject)

Date: 2006-12-04 10:04 pm (UTC)
Not to say that all people with similar mindsets are selfish, though - there is always a limit to how many and what kind of government programs to enact. Striking the balance between enacting programs to benefit society and reducing the burden on the public is always a challenge. But in this case I think the benefits of a public library system VERY CLEARLY outweigh the costs, and that's why I say that she comes across as being very narrow-minded.

I do think that her desire to control what her children wants to read plays significantly into this narrow-mindedness, but as I'm not her I can't say for certain. It seems that her choice of "public libraries" for today's attack (instead of, for example, art museums / public broadcasting / retirement benefits for government officials / something more expensive with a smaller target) just HAS to come from some other personal bone to pick.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2020

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags