The entitlement is a problem, I agree. I also believe that if more people kept their legs shut and zippers up, things would be much better. Abstinence education kind of boils down to "Sex leads to pregnancy and STDs. The only way to completely prevent these is not to have sex, and when you do have sex, have it with someone that you're in a permanent committed relationship with and that you can provide for children with." Repeat that enough, starting early enough, and it might filter through hormones and whatnot. It works for a lot of people.
Unfortunately, those are people that have a strong hope of a life that includes luxuries and other trappings of the modern definition of success.
One of the classic characteristics of poverty is a high birth rate. There are proven sociological and biological factors for this, i.e. more births means more chances of at least one child surviving, more children means more hands to do the work necessary for survival, etc. The unfortunate part is that with modern (usually urban) poverty is that more children actually means more work without more hands to do the work, because of child labor laws. (Note: I'm not saying that those laws are wrong.) In the cycle of work/eat/sleep, one of the few forms of entertainment and/or pleasure (and just about the only one that doesn't usually cost money) is sex. When you are feeding a family of even as few as 3 on minimum wage, especially in an urban environment, milk takes precedence over birth control (assuming you have the time and ability to get to even a free clinic at the usually absurdly few hours such clinics can afford to be open to get the prescription).
Yes, there are programs available. Most of them require reams of paperwork or going to inconvenient places during work hours or both. The system was irretrevably broken from the get-go, mainly because it's not a single system to begin with, it's a disparate network of systems with layers of territorial bureaucracies and poor inter-system communication. There are more cracks to fall into than actual surface area of honest-to-god help.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2006-11-03 05:18 am (UTC)Unfortunately, those are people that have a strong hope of a life that includes luxuries and other trappings of the modern definition of success.
One of the classic characteristics of poverty is a high birth rate. There are proven sociological and biological factors for this, i.e. more births means more chances of at least one child surviving, more children means more hands to do the work necessary for survival, etc. The unfortunate part is that with modern (usually urban) poverty is that more children actually means more work without more hands to do the work, because of child labor laws. (Note: I'm not saying that those laws are wrong.) In the cycle of work/eat/sleep, one of the few forms of entertainment and/or pleasure (and just about the only one that doesn't usually cost money) is sex. When you are feeding a family of even as few as 3 on minimum wage, especially in an urban environment, milk takes precedence over birth control (assuming you have the time and ability to get to even a free clinic at the usually absurdly few hours such clinics can afford to be open to get the prescription).
Yes, there are programs available. Most of them require reams of paperwork or going to inconvenient places during work hours or both. The system was irretrevably broken from the get-go, mainly because it's not a single system to begin with, it's a disparate network of systems with layers of territorial bureaucracies and poor inter-system communication. There are more cracks to fall into than actual surface area of honest-to-god help.