Shades of Hoover?
Jul. 13th, 2006 06:45 amI'm a union member. My union has done some good things for me and some bad things, but the good things have been far more numerous. When I was struggling with my first two grade seven classes, they protected my job by enforcing the professional evaluation process, which ensured me another chance. I've become a good teacher in large part because the union wouldn't let any of those first four principals fire me. (Yes, four. In two years. Three were within five months - and I got knocked for lack of consistency in following office procedures. But that's another story.)
So when I learn that the Bush administration is going to sneak through a changed definition of who constitutes a manager, to include pretty much every senior worker in most industries, I get angry. I'm the lead literacy teacher for the junior division at my school. I would meet the new definition of management - though I have no power to define anyone else's job, hire, or fire. Oh, and some years I have an EA, who is technically under my supervision.
This doesn't affect me, thank God. But anything that makes it harder for workers to get fairness from their employers is a bad thing.
http://www.alternet.org/workplace/38823/?cID=154141#c154141
So when I learn that the Bush administration is going to sneak through a changed definition of who constitutes a manager, to include pretty much every senior worker in most industries, I get angry. I'm the lead literacy teacher for the junior division at my school. I would meet the new definition of management - though I have no power to define anyone else's job, hire, or fire. Oh, and some years I have an EA, who is technically under my supervision.
This doesn't affect me, thank God. But anything that makes it harder for workers to get fairness from their employers is a bad thing.
http://www.alternet.org/workplace/38823/?cID=154141#c154141