ext_20359 ([identity profile] paka.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] velvetpage 2006-08-17 07:23 pm (UTC)

It would still be a public institution, paid for by the public though? I have no interest in being taxed for the privilage of having my own faith ignored and locked out of the public sector. This is a particularly bitter point given the Bush Administration's faith-based initiatives.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting