velvetpage: (Default)
velvetpage ([personal profile] velvetpage) wrote2004-09-27 07:36 pm

The longest short week ever

This is, for the kids, a short week. For me, it's a week where one day is a P.A. Day, and therefore an emotional, if not actual, day off. Even with the in-service I'm giving on research models, Friday will be much easier than a normal teaching day. (In terms of PR, that's not normally something I mention to non-teachers. It doesn't look good on the profession to call a non-teaching day a day off. The truth is that a normally-stressful day at the office for most people is still fairly straightforward compared with the emotional overload of preparing, teaching, and dealing with all the issues of all the kids of a day of teaching. But I digress.)

Today I had an in-service. By that, I mean I had to go to the Memorial building a half-hour's drive across town, through some nasty traffic, by 4:00 in the afternoon, in order to spend an hour and a half learning to do something essential to my job. I'll have to go to part two tomorrow.

Ten years ago, stuff like this was usually done on a P.A. day, of which there were nine or ten each year - basically once a month. I remember those days from the student perspective - good times, for sure. Since 1995, though, the number of P.A. Days has been cut to a total of four, one of which is always the last weekday in June. The others are spaced throughout the year. They are used for things like in-services, teacher prep time for specific tasks like report cards, parent-teacher interviews, and in the case of the one in June, shutting down the school for the summer.

Most of the in-services which used to happen on these days have been condensed from three hours to one or two, and placed after school or during school hours. That means a teacher either gives up their after-school activities (such as planning and marking) or spends hours planning for a supply teacher for half a day, in order to attend. In both cases, teachers end up using "free" time on work activities. I worked an eleven-hour day today, and will do so again tomorrow. Wednesday I will be catching up on the marking and planning I did not have time for before. I doubt I will be caught up by Friday.

I'm of the school of teachers who believes things like this should be done during the summer, and expenses incurred (such as extra babysitting) should be tax-deductible or perhaps even reimbursed by the Board of Ed. I do not have time to spend eleven hours a day on my job! I have a toddler, and a life outside of work. This is not a reasonable demand. Eight, even nine hours a day, is not unreasonable. But eleven???

Please, if this would be considered reasonable in your office job, let me know. I want to know if I'm expecting too much from my employer here.

[identity profile] sassy-fae.livejournal.com 2004-09-29 09:38 am (UTC)(link)
True. :( It's unfortunate that you're boxed into this sort of situation even with a union behind you.

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2004-09-29 12:56 pm (UTC)(link)
For the duty, we're going to try to hash something out at the staff meeting on Friday - basically, three adults outside, of which one must be a teacher and the other an EA. That should cut down on duty time for all concerned; currently all the EA's are out every break, and two teachers as well, making five people for two hundred kids. The usual ratio for yard supervision is one teacher for every hundred kids or so. We have more than double that. Since I'm not the only teacher to feel this is excessive, we should be able to do something about it.

The in-services are over for the moment, and I left school at 3:10 today. The baby is out with Aunty Krista, so life is quiet for about two hours now. I'm going to enjoy it. :)