velvetpage: (Default)
velvetpage ([personal profile] velvetpage) wrote2011-05-03 03:25 am

A roller-coaster ride that slams you into the ground at the end

I can't think of a better descriptor for this election night than that.


We have a Conservative Majority government. This is bad, bad news. It means the Conservatives can basically do whatever they want for the next four years and unless their own party rebels, there is no way to hold them accountable in Parliament; they have enough votes that if they force their party to vote with them (and they will) nobody can stop them.

The Liberals have been thoroughly trounced. They're not quite as badly off as Kim Campbell's Progressive Conservatives were in 1993, but it's pretty darn close. Ignatieff lost his own seat.

The Bloc Quebecois has been virtually eliminated from the map; it has too few seats to even get official party status. There's already considerable speculation about what this might mean for Quebec's upcoming provincial election; all those out-of-work separatists suddenly flooding the Parti Quebecois for volunteers, campaign managers, and candidates, against a demoralized Liberal government there. . . that could be interesting. In the meantime, in the biggest upset since, well, 1993, the Bloc has been replaced by the NDP in Quebec. Nobody looked for that. Several candidates there were basically warm bodies in an election they had no hope of winning. One was assistant manager of a bar in Hull and speaks almost no French, in her 90% francophone riding. Another was on vacation in Vegas and was mobbed at the airport by reporters. The poor woman ran and hid. And most of those NDP candidates were at best soft nationalists; some are soft separatists. This is a pretty significant silver lining for me; Harper can't afford to antagonize the NDP when that means antagonizing Quebec.

The NDP stole a chunk of Liberal votes in Ontario, and a bunch more soft Liberals (presumably the ones who couldn't bring themselves to vote Conservative or NDP) seem to have stayed home. The result: Conservative percentages are up, but I can't find any numbers on voter turnout as compared to 2008. If I'm right, then basically they pulled off a majority by hanging tight, keeping their own voters, and scaring off Liberal voters. They won by playing dirty.

I've decided what I'm going to do.

For too long, I've been an armchair politician, willing to peddle my vote between several parties on the basis of several factors, never committing to any of them. This is very, very common on the Left in Canada, and while it has its benefits for tolerance and good feeling, in the end it loses elections and costs us a voice. I have ideas. I have things to bring to the table. But they're being heard in ways that don't affect the outcome of elections.

So tomorrow, I'm stopping by my newly-re-elected NDP MP's campaign office while they'e packing up, and joining the party formally. If possible, I'll join the provincial branch at the same time, though it may require a separate trip and fee; then I'll make myself known at my NDP MPP's office. I'm going to volunteer for the NDP for the Ontario election in the fall. I'm going to go to riding meetings and write for riding association publications between elections. I'm going to take my fairvote.ca flyers, printed by [livejournal.com profile] mrs_dm, with me. Provincially, my talking points will be slightly different from my talking points in the federal office, because the responsibilities of the two levels of government are different, but I'm no longer confining myself to slactivism on the internet.

It's time to actually make things happen.

Right now, I'm calling in sick because I've had absolutely no sleep and I'm still not asleep. I can't face trying to stay non-partisan with my students while explaining what a Harper majority means for Canada.

[identity profile] doc-mystery.livejournal.com 2011-05-03 10:43 am (UTC)(link)
Time to unite the Centre/Left.

::B::

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2011-05-03 10:47 am (UTC)(link)
The possibility has already been brought up on CBC last night by the pundits. I remain unconvinced; I think we would be better off spending the next four years campaigning for electoral reform so that the centre-left parties would get a proportional vote and have a chance to have all voices heard. I dislike the idea of leaving out all the fringe ideas because they don't appeal to centrists, and vice-versa, and I'm VERY leery of uniting with the Liberals at a time when the majority of seats on the left are coming out of a province that hates the Liberals.

[identity profile] siobhan63.livejournal.com 2011-05-03 11:40 am (UTC)(link)
The voting system needs to change, definitely, but really - do you think for an instant Harper's going to be open to even mentioning the word? He's got his majority now - he'd never endorse anything that might jeopardize future ones, and while the Liberals are on their knees, he hasn't quite achieved his life-long goal of completely eradicating the party (but canning the vote subsidy will undoubtedly help).

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2011-05-03 12:07 pm (UTC)(link)
What you're saying is that in order to get access to a fair vote that will allow for all voices, we're going to have to silence some voices.

Much as I regret it, I'm afraid you might be right.

[identity profile] kisekileia.livejournal.com 2011-05-03 12:19 pm (UTC)(link)
I agree with this. I think uniting the NDP and Liberals would result in the NDP moving towards the centre and losing some of what makes them appeal to left-wing voters. I'd rather see the NDP and the Greens unite.

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2011-05-03 11:13 am (UTC)(link)
This article (http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/second-reading/silver-powers/the-liberal-party-what-went-wrong-and-where-to-next/article2008011/page1/) caught my eye on this topic.